Call of Duty MP is free — now and forever

by Dan on February 11, 2011

For the last several months, there have been rumors that Activision is going to charge people to play the multiplayer component of Call of Duty. These rumors are false. This page has become a historical archive the rumors’ origins as well as Activision’s official statements on the matter. But I’ll give you a hint: They keep saying the same thing…

POSTED 7/19/10: There’s a video that made the rounds today of a 360 player getting a glitchy, incomplete message that uses the phrase “Modern Warfare 2″ and half of the word “membership.” Uh oh — does this mean Activision will start charging for COD multiplayer? No, it does not.

This video shows just a glitch — since you can access a Live subscription renewal from within the MW2 game interface, it appears some data got jammed between two parts of Live. It’s not a secret portal to some nefarious plot to charge people for COD multiplayer — and there are no plans to do that. As I was poking around for some answers, Infinity Ward’s Robert Bowling addressed it on Twitter:

Modern Warfare 2 subscription plan rumors going around. For the record, nobody has to pay to play COD or MW2 multiplayer, nor will they.

UPDATE 7/19/10: Robert has also added a blog post on the topic where he confirms that no subscription plan for MW2 exists nor is one being planned.

UPDATE 7/19/10: To me, that was pretty clear that we’re talking about COD as a whole. But just in case you are worried that this only covers MW2, Treyarch’s Josh Olin has added a bit more clarity for the upcoming COD: Black Ops:

No, you will not have to ‘Pay to Play’ #CODBlackOps Multiplayer either. Rumor -> Squashed.

UPDATE 7/19/10: Activision has given IGN an official statement as well:

Reports of a subscription membership in Modern Warfare 2 are not true. Activision has no plans to charge gamers to play Call of Duty multiplayer.

Obviously, if you are playing on Xbox 360, you will need to pay for your Xbox Live Gold subscription as you currently do. But there will be no additional fees to play MW2 or Black Ops.

People often assume the worst, so thanks to all the people who asked if this was real or not before they reacted. There are often logical answers to those kind of questions.

UPDATE 11/24/10: Amazingly, months after its July appearance, this rumor remains in November, so Activision Publishing CEO Eric Hirshberg addressed it yet again in a recent interview with Industry Gamers:

Are we going to be charging for multiplayer? The answer is no. The experience you have out of the box, connecting with the online community to play Call of Duty is absolutely integral to the experience and we’ll never charge for that. It’s not going to be something we’ll attempt to monetize; it’s part of the package.

All I’m trying to get across is I can unequivocally say we will never, ever charge for the multiplayer.

UPDATE 2/12/11: Happy new year! This rumor persists so I am bumping it up on the blog. The Q4 2010 earnings call announcement of a studio called Beachhead has fanned the flames yet again, but the data in this document stands. Everything everybody said last year is still true: you will not have to pay to play COD multiplayer. Even the game announced for the Chinese market is a free-to-play model supported by microtransactions. Please, tell your friends — the fact that the rumor mill keeps churning this one up despite direct statements from the people who actually would be able to make those decisions…it’s downright ridiculous at this point.

UPDATE 5/10/11: I am stunned that the rumor is making the rounds again, so I’m updating this story with the latest reiteration of the same thing that has been the truth since the beginning. In the Q1 2011 earnings call held yesterday, while answering a follow-up question about Beachhead Studios’ project, Eric clarified this one more time for good measure:

While we are attempting to deliver new, incremental experiences [...] we are not attempting to monetize or take any experience away that currently comes as part of the value proposition of buying the game.

UPDATE 5/31/11: We now have details about Beachhead’s project, and it’s called Call of Duty: Elite. Both COD multiplayer and COD Elite are free — so not only is Activision not charging you for multiplayer, but you’re going to get more stuff for free. Elite will offer an optional premium membership for some of its services, but it does not take anything away from multiplayer, nor does it unbalance MP gameplay. You can get more info at callofduty.com/elite.

If you really, really want to pay for the multiplayer experience on its own — if what you have paid is simply too good a deal and you feel deeply obligated to fork over more cash — then pick a dollar amount that seems fair and please donate that to the Call of Duty Endowment. Then you can enjoy the value-packed multiplayer experience guilt-free.

I dream of a day this rumor goes away. I’m starting to think that people would rather be angry about something that does not exist than they would be happy about getting what they expect for their money…!

  • Pingback: Rumor: Video shows option for Modern Warfare 2 “membership” on Xbox LIVE [Update] | Wouldyoukindly.com

  • http://theycallmefox.com II F0XH0UND II

    Awesome blog post Dan! Will be spreading this post around the various CoD Communities. We got quite a few people worried on the boards. This'll help out.

  • http://oneofswords.com/ Dan (OneOfSwords)

    And I can understand why they would be worried. But as often happens, all the rumors and speculation and fears were fueled by statements made by people who do not work at Infinity Ward, Treyarch, or Activision.

  • xL717

    The sad part is that everyone believes this now. Look at IGN's comments section. Call of Duty is now all of a sudden hated by everyone.

  • Moozipan Cheese

    Nice. It seems people are eager to jump the gun if it means hating on Activision. It's like the gaming community vs EA Games all over again.

    Oh, and JD_2020 just confirmed that Call of Duty: Black Ops won't have it either.

  • http://twitter.com/Paranerd Paranerd

    Well, there was that one quote from Kotick being disappointed that he's not getting a share of the Xbox Live Gold subscriptions….

  • http://twitter.com/reddjoey Joey Mock

    Thanks for clearing this up Dan. I saw some threads going crazy with wild speculation with little fact.

  • http://oneofswords.com/ Dan (OneOfSwords)

    Yes, I saw that quote. The guy is entitled to his opinion — but he was not announcing a fee for playing multiplayer.

    If those leaps of logic were true, I would have noted the fact that I have not received a new guitar in some time — and then one would magically appear, because someone would have bought me one.

  • http://oneofswords.com/ Dan (OneOfSwords)

    Well, if you see anyone who is confused or upset and has the wrong facts…just link to this post. That's why it's here!

  • http://oneofswords.com/ Dan (OneOfSwords)

    It is the internet, after all.

  • PwnShop

    People blew this out of proportion. I titled the video as a past tense phrase. I speculated that it was something they had “planned” on, but obviously it was scrapped since we were playing for free. I had no idea it would cause this much uproar. I think it's funny that almost every reference I saw to my post on 360junkies.com omitted the last part of my post where I stated that I may be wrong with my take on what the menu was. – PwnShop

  • http://oneofswords.com/ Dan (OneOfSwords)

    Bad news travels far faster than objectivity, Pwn. Thanks for chiming in; I saw your original post and wanted to make sure that what I wrote above did not call you a liar in any way — you saw what you saw and I don't doubt that. It just wasn't what people assumed it meant, and that's what I had to clarify.

    I agree with you that people blew it out of proportion!

  • http://twitter.com/zigs00 Edd

    Thanks for this! Was incredibly sceptical of that video, glad to have some concrete confirmation that it is bullcrap. Definitely going to spread this link around and let people know.

  • http://abstract360.com Kamikaze8

    Between him and Pachter people have been going crazy. Glad to hear it isnt true Dan. Thanks for the update.

  • Giles

    Give it time, they'll find a time/way to charge monthly. This is a business. You really think Actvi is in it for the gamer?!? Anyone kissing Dan's arss is misinformed.

  • http://oneofswords.com/ Dan (OneOfSwords)

    Unfounded cynicism is out, Giles. The hot new trend is reacting to things as they happen, not before they never happen.

    Nobody's kissing my ass, but nobody else is coming in with a sour reaction to good news, either. If this isn't your vibe, don't come here.

  • http://twitter.com/jromz03 Jem Cruz

    what about other future titles?

  • Pingback: Modern Warfare 2 subscription message dismissed as 'just a glitch' | Joystiq

  • spiralgray

    Have you read the recent article with Pachter in your alma-mater magazine (i.e. OXM)? His prediction is that in the very near future we'll be paying to play multiplayer games. So I can see how anyone who might have read that article and then seen this information could jump to that conclusion. My personal opinion is that Pachter talks to hear himself talk.

  • thecomissioner

    My concern is that there is no info on the “action adventure” game being made by sledgehammer games.
    And i have a feeling that it will be a pay to play game.

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/CKQ73CZHQAEEMMJ4Q23IHV2OFE Amy

    Thanks for setting the record straight, Dan. As usual, your clear voice is appreciated amid all the hype. :)

  • http://oneofswords.com/ Dan (OneOfSwords)

    My job is to clarify facts. His is not.

  • http://oneofswords.com/ Dan (OneOfSwords)

    “Activision has no plans to charge gamers to play Call of Duty multiplayer.” “Nobody has to pay to play COD, nor will they.”

    Don't know how much more clear they can be, Jem!

  • http://oneofswords.com/ Dan (OneOfSwords)

    Like I said…I understand reactions to things that actually happen, but I can't get behind negative reactions to things that haven't happened, or anger over assumptions. Whenever Sledgehammer is ready to show what they're working on, that's the time to react.

  • http://twitter.com/splattermonkeys David Milobar

    How about Pay-to-Play-Better? Multiplayer will always be free…okay, I get that, in principle. But Activision currently has four houses working on current or future iterations of CoD. To “further monetize Call of Duty”, a fifth house has been brought in to deal with digital content. I don’t read this as another house to help bring map packs to market – I read this as future purchases of multiplayer weapons, attachments, or effects will actually be tied to real world money.

  • Anonymous

    Truth is… XBOX IS ALREADY PAYING FOR IT!

  • http://twitter.com/Hellhog Christian Sutter

    People that see these glitches and think it means subscription are stupid. The original vid that started a rumor looked just like an Xbox LIVE subscription screen. Of course idiots decide that it’s not what it looks like and is instead it is what they want it to look like. My gosh, at this point if someone is adament that it is for a subscription then they either want one of two things: A) something to complain about because they are a joyless miserable tumor, or B) in reality they want it to be a subscription service.

  • http://oneofswords.com/ Dan (OneOfSwords)

    I think you mean that you have to pay for an Xbox Live subscription? I pay for one of those too and I’m a happy customer. But if you’re just using Live to play COD…man, you’re missing out on all the other stuff.

    Just so we’re clear, though: Microsoft charges for Xbox Live. Activision does not.

  • http://oneofswords.com/ Dan (OneOfSwords)

    I read it as “an innovative new digital platform and social services for our Call of Duty community” because that’s what was said during the earnings call. Certainly open to interpretation, but the microtransaction model you’re suggesting is what they are planning to do in China. Maybe they’ll do it here too, but I don’t think so; that model hasn’t been so successful in the past. Remember when EA tried it a few years back? I heard a lot of squawking at the time. I think China likes that model and the US doesn’t.

    To me the key word is “platform.” As you noted, that’s not likely to be just a DLC creation house, because I don’t think you can call DLC a platform, unless they have a really broad definition of it or they’re reinventing it altogether. I am curious to see what it actually means.

  • Pingback: Call of Duty Content Could Go Free — Platform Nation

  • http://twitter.com/pitabuddy Bart
  • http://oneofswords.com/ Dan (OneOfSwords)

    Please read the full article above, specifically the 5/10 update. 

  • http://oneofswords.com/ Dan (OneOfSwords)

    Please read the full article above, specifically the 5/10 update. 

  • King Poo

    I kind of have a feeling that they might use the VIP pass that company are using now.

  • Nicholas

    Okay, what kind of company charges a subscription when you already pay for a subscription? No company would ever make you pay multiplayer when you already pay for XBox Live unless it were DLC, in which case it’s a flat fee. Internet doesn’t count, because if paying for internet and then a subscription fee for a game costs money is the same as my argument, then so is paying for electricity and then paying for the amount you use.

  • http://twitter.com/Bionic92 Bionic92

    But that’s more of a deterrent against used sales, rather than a monthly fee to play multiplayer.

  • NoMaadic
  • Pingback: CoD Elite: Setting the Facts Straight « IRBGamer

  • http://twitter.com/madman32395 Justin Barth

    i wish for one day that XBL would be free for multiplayer

Previous post:

Next post: